compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Incorporate flaw remediation into configuration management' (34aac8b2-488a-2b96-7280-5b9b481a317a)
| Control Domain |
Control |
Name |
MetadataId |
Category |
Title |
Owner |
Requirements |
Description |
Info |
Policy# |
| FedRAMP_High_R4 |
SI-2 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_SI-2 |
FedRAMP High SI-2 |
System And Information Integrity |
Flaw Remediation |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Identifies, reports, and corrects information system flaws;
b. Tests software and firmware updates related to flaw remediation for effectiveness and potential side effects before installation;
c. Installs security-relevant software and firmware updates within [Assignment: organization- defined time period] of the release of the updates; and
d. Incorporates flaw remediation into the organizational configuration management process.
Supplemental Guidance: Organizations identify information systems affected by announced software flaws including potential vulnerabilities resulting from those flaws, and report this information to designated organizational personnel with information security responsibilities. Security-relevant software updates include, for example, patches, service packs, hot fixes, and anti-virus signatures. Organizations also address flaws discovered during security assessments, continuous monitoring, incident response activities, and system error handling. Organizations take advantage of available resources such as the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) or Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) databases in remediating flaws discovered in organizational information systems. By incorporating flaw remediation into ongoing configuration management processes, required/anticipated remediation actions can be tracked and verified. Flaw remediation actions that can be tracked and verified include, for example, determining whether organizations follow US-CERT guidance and Information Assurance Vulnerability Alerts. Organization-defined time periods for updating security-relevant software and firmware may vary based on a variety of factors including, for example, the security category of the information system or the criticality of the update (i.e., severity of the vulnerability related to the discovered flaw). Some types of flaw remediation may require more testing than other types. Organizations determine the degree and type of testing needed for the specific type of flaw remediation activity under consideration and also the types of changes that are to be configuration-managed. In some situations, organizations may determine that the testing of software and/or firmware updates is not necessary or practical,
for example, when implementing simple anti-virus signature updates. Organizations may also consider in testing decisions, whether security-relevant software or firmware updates are obtained from authorized sources with appropriate digital signatures. Related controls: CA-2, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-8, MA-2, IR-4, RA-5, SA-10, SA-11, SI-11. |
link |
16 |
| FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
SI-2 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_SI-2 |
FedRAMP Moderate SI-2 |
System And Information Integrity |
Flaw Remediation |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Identifies, reports, and corrects information system flaws;
b. Tests software and firmware updates related to flaw remediation for effectiveness and potential side effects before installation;
c. Installs security-relevant software and firmware updates within [Assignment: organization- defined time period] of the release of the updates; and
d. Incorporates flaw remediation into the organizational configuration management process.
Supplemental Guidance: Organizations identify information systems affected by announced software flaws including potential vulnerabilities resulting from those flaws, and report this information to designated organizational personnel with information security responsibilities. Security-relevant software updates include, for example, patches, service packs, hot fixes, and anti-virus signatures. Organizations also address flaws discovered during security assessments, continuous monitoring, incident response activities, and system error handling. Organizations take advantage of available resources such as the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) or Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) databases in remediating flaws discovered in organizational information systems. By incorporating flaw remediation into ongoing configuration management processes, required/anticipated remediation actions can be tracked and verified. Flaw remediation actions that can be tracked and verified include, for example, determining whether organizations follow US-CERT guidance and Information Assurance Vulnerability Alerts. Organization-defined time periods for updating security-relevant software and firmware may vary based on a variety of factors including, for example, the security category of the information system or the criticality of the update (i.e., severity of the vulnerability related to the discovered flaw). Some types of flaw remediation may require more testing than other types. Organizations determine the degree and type of testing needed for the specific type of flaw remediation activity under consideration and also the types of changes that are to be configuration-managed. In some situations, organizations may determine that the testing of software and/or firmware updates is not necessary or practical,
for example, when implementing simple anti-virus signature updates. Organizations may also consider in testing decisions, whether security-relevant software or firmware updates are obtained from authorized sources with appropriate digital signatures. Related controls: CA-2, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-8, MA-2, IR-4, RA-5, SA-10, SA-11, SI-11. |
link |
16 |
| hipaa |
0628.10h1System.6-10.h |
hipaa-0628.10h1System.6-10.h |
0628.10h1System.6-10.h |
06 Configuration Management |
0628.10h1System.6-10.h 10.04 Security of System Files |
Shared |
n/a |
If systems or system components in production are no longer supported by the developer, vendor, or manufacturer, the organization is able to provide evidence of a formal migration plan approved by management to replace the system or system components. |
|
4 |
| hipaa |
0635.10k1Organizational.12-10.k |
hipaa-0635.10k1Organizational.12-10.k |
0635.10k1Organizational.12-10.k |
06 Configuration Management |
0635.10k1Organizational.12-10.k 10.05 Security In Development and Support Processes |
Shared |
n/a |
Managers responsible for application systems are also responsible for the strict control (security) of the project or support environment and ensure that all proposed system changes are reviewed to check that they do not compromise the security of either the system or the operating environment. |
|
9 |
| hipaa |
0713.10m2Organizational.5-10.m |
hipaa-0713.10m2Organizational.5-10.m |
0713.10m2Organizational.5-10.m |
07 Vulnerability Management |
0713.10m2Organizational.5-10.m 10.06 Technical Vulnerability Management |
Shared |
n/a |
Patches are tested and evaluated before they are installed. |
|
5 |
| hipaa |
0786.10m2Organizational.13-10.m |
hipaa-0786.10m2Organizational.13-10.m |
0786.10m2Organizational.13-10.m |
07 Vulnerability Management |
0786.10m2Organizational.13-10.m 10.06 Technical Vulnerability Management |
Shared |
n/a |
A prioritization process is implemented to determine which patches are applied across the organization's systems. |
|
1 |
| hipaa |
0787.10m2Organizational.14-10.m |
hipaa-0787.10m2Organizational.14-10.m |
0787.10m2Organizational.14-10.m |
07 Vulnerability Management |
0787.10m2Organizational.14-10.m 10.06 Technical Vulnerability Management |
Shared |
n/a |
Patches installed in the production environment are also installed in the organization's disaster recovery environment in a timely manner. |
|
4 |
| ISO27001-2013 |
A.12.6.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.12.6.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.12.6.1 |
Operations Security |
Management of technical vulnerabilities |
Shared |
n/a |
Information about technical vulnerabilities of information systems being used shall be obtained in a timely fashion, the organization's exposure to such vulnerabilities evaluated and appropriate measures taken to address the associated risk. |
link |
11 |
| ISO27001-2013 |
A.14.2.2 |
ISO27001-2013_A.14.2.2 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.14.2.2 |
System Acquisition, Development And Maintenance |
System change control procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
Changes to systems within the development lifecycle shall be controlled by the use of formal change control procedures. |
link |
25 |
| ISO27001-2013 |
A.14.2.3 |
ISO27001-2013_A.14.2.3 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.14.2.3 |
System Acquisition, Development And Maintenance |
Technical review of applications after operating platform changes |
Shared |
n/a |
When operating platforms are changed, business critical applications shall be reviewed and tested to ensure there is no adverse impact on organizational operations or security. |
link |
18 |
| ISO27001-2013 |
A.16.1.3 |
ISO27001-2013_A.16.1.3 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.16.1.3 |
Information Security Incident Management |
Reporting information security weaknesses |
Shared |
n/a |
Employees and contractors using the organization's information systems and services shall be required to note and report any observed or suspected information security weaknesses in systems or services. |
link |
4 |
|
mp.sw.2 Acceptance and commissioning |
mp.sw.2 Acceptance and commissioning |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
59 |
| NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.14.1 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.14.1 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.14.1 |
System and Information Integrity |
Identify, report, and correct system flaws in a timely manner. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
Organizations identify systems that are affected by announced software and firmware flaws including potential vulnerabilities resulting from those flaws and report this information to designated personnel with information security responsibilities. Security-relevant updates include patches, service packs, hot fixes, and anti-virus signatures. Organizations address flaws discovered during security assessments, continuous monitoring, incident response activities, and system error handling. Organizations can take advantage of available resources such as the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) database or Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database in remediating flaws discovered in organizational systems. Organization-defined time periods for updating security-relevant software and firmware may vary based on a variety of factors including the criticality of the update (i.e., severity of the vulnerability related to the discovered flaw). Some types of flaw remediation may require more testing than other types of remediation. [SP 800-40] provides guidance on patch management technologies. |
link |
18 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
SI-2 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_SI-2 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 SI-2 |
System And Information Integrity |
Flaw Remediation |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Identifies, reports, and corrects information system flaws;
b. Tests software and firmware updates related to flaw remediation for effectiveness and potential side effects before installation;
c. Installs security-relevant software and firmware updates within [Assignment: organization- defined time period] of the release of the updates; and
d. Incorporates flaw remediation into the organizational configuration management process.
Supplemental Guidance: Organizations identify information systems affected by announced software flaws including potential vulnerabilities resulting from those flaws, and report this information to designated organizational personnel with information security responsibilities. Security-relevant software updates include, for example, patches, service packs, hot fixes, and anti-virus signatures. Organizations also address flaws discovered during security assessments, continuous monitoring, incident response activities, and system error handling. Organizations take advantage of available resources such as the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) or Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) databases in remediating flaws discovered in organizational information systems. By incorporating flaw remediation into ongoing configuration management processes, required/anticipated remediation actions can be tracked and verified. Flaw remediation actions that can be tracked and verified include, for example, determining whether organizations follow US-CERT guidance and Information Assurance Vulnerability Alerts. Organization-defined time periods for updating security-relevant software and firmware may vary based on a variety of factors including, for example, the security category of the information system or the criticality of the update (i.e., severity of the vulnerability related to the discovered flaw). Some types of flaw remediation may require more testing than other types. Organizations determine the degree and type of testing needed for the specific type of flaw remediation activity under consideration and also the types of changes that are to be configuration-managed. In some situations, organizations may determine that the testing of software and/or firmware updates is not necessary or practical,
for example, when implementing simple anti-virus signature updates. Organizations may also consider in testing decisions, whether security-relevant software or firmware updates are obtained from authorized sources with appropriate digital signatures. Related controls: CA-2, CA-7, CM-3, CM-5, CM-8, MA-2, IR-4, RA-5, SA-10, SA-11, SI-11. |
link |
16 |
| NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
SI-2 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_SI-2 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SI-2 |
System and Information Integrity |
Flaw Remediation |
Shared |
n/a |
a. Identify, report, and correct system flaws;
b. Test software and firmware updates related to flaw remediation for effectiveness and potential side effects before installation;
c. Install security-relevant software and firmware updates within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of the release of the updates; and
d. Incorporate flaw remediation into the organizational configuration management process. |
link |
16 |
|
op.exp.2 Security configuration |
op.exp.2 Security configuration |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
112 |
|
op.exp.3 Security configuration management |
op.exp.3 Security configuration management |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
123 |
|
op.exp.4 Security maintenance and updates |
op.exp.4 Security maintenance and updates |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
78 |
|
op.exp.5 Change management |
op.exp.5 Change management |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
71 |
|
op.exp.7 Incident management |
op.exp.7 Incident management |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
103 |
|
op.mon.3 Monitoring |
op.mon.3 Monitoring |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
51 |
|
org.2 Security regulations |
org.2 Security regulations |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
100 |
| SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
2.7 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_2.7 |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 2.7 |
2. Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities |
Identify known vulnerabilities within the local SWIFT environment by implementing a regular vulnerability scanning process and act upon results. |
Shared |
n/a |
Secure zone (including dedicated operator PC) systems are scanned for vulnerabilities using an up-to-date, reputable scanning tool and results are considered for appropriate resolving actions. |
link |
14 |