compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Develop information security policies and procedures' (af227964-5b8b-22a2-9364-06d2cb9d6d7c)
Control Domain |
Control |
Name |
MetadataId |
Category |
Title |
Owner |
Requirements |
Description |
Info |
Policy# |
FedRAMP_High_R4 |
AU-1 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_AU-1 |
FedRAMP High AU-1 |
Audit And Accountability |
Audit And Accountability Policy And
Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops, documents, and disseminates to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:
1. An audit and accountability policy that addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and
2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the audit and accountability policy and associated audit and accountability controls; and
b. Reviews and updates the current:
1. Audit and accountability policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency]; and
2. Audit and accountability procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the establishment of policy and procedures for the effective implementation of selected security controls and control enhancements in the AU family. Policy and procedures reflect applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidance. Security program policies and procedures at the organization level may make the need for system-specific policies and procedures unnecessary. The policy can be included as part of the general information security policy for organizations or conversely, can be represented by multiple policies reflecting the complex nature of certain organizations. The procedures can be established for the security program in general and for particular information systems, if needed. The organizational risk management strategy is a key factor in establishing policy and procedures. Related control: PM-9.
Control Enhancements: None.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-12, 800-100. |
link |
4 |
FedRAMP_High_R4 |
PL-2 |
FedRAMP_High_R4_PL-2 |
FedRAMP High PL-2 |
Planning |
System Security Plan |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops a security plan for the information system that:
1. Is consistent with the organization’s enterprise architecture;
2. Explicitly defines the authorization boundary for the system;
3. Describes the operational context of the information system in terms of missions and business processes;
4. Provides the security categorization of the information system including supporting rationale;
5. Describes the operational environment for the information system and relationships with or connections to other information systems;
6. Provides an overview of the security requirements for the system;
7. Identifies any relevant overlays, if applicable;
8. Describes the security controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements including a rationale for the tailoring and supplementation decisions; and
9. Is reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation;
b. Distributes copies of the security plan and communicates subsequent changes to the plan to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles];
c. Reviews the security plan for the information system [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];
d. Updates the plan to address changes to the information system/environment of operation or problems identified during plan implementation or security control assessments; and
e. Protects the security plan from unauthorized disclosure and modification.
Supplemental Guidance: Security plans relate security requirements to a set of security controls and control enhancements. Security plans also describe, at a high level, how the security controls and control enhancements meet those security requirements, but do not provide detailed, technical descriptions of the specific design or implementation of the controls/enhancements. Security plans contain sufficient information (including the specification of parameter values for assignment and selection statements either explicitly or by reference) to enable a design and implementation that is unambiguously compliant with the intent of the plans and subsequent determinations of risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation if the plan is implemented as intended. Organizations can also apply tailoring guidance to the security control baselines in Appendix D and CNSS Instruction 1253 to develop overlays for community-wide use or to address specialized requirements, technologies, or missions/environments of operation (e.g., DoD-tactical, Federal Public Key Infrastructure, or Federal Identity, Credential, and Access Management, space operations). Appendix I provides guidance on developing overlays.
Security plans need not be single documents; the plans can be a collection of various documents including documents that already exist. Effective security plans make extensive use of references to policies, procedures, and additional documents (e.g., design and implementation specifications) where more detailed information can be obtained. This reduces the documentation requirements associated with security programs and maintains security-related information in other established management/operational areas related to enterprise architecture, system development life cycle, systems engineering, and acquisition. For example, security plans do not contain detailed contingency plan or incident response plan information but instead provide explicitly or by reference, sufficient information to define what needs to be accomplished by those plans. Related controls: AC-2, AC-6, AC-14, AC-17, AC-20, CA-2, CA-3, CA-7, CM-9, CP-2, IR-8, MA-4, MA-5, MP-2, MP-4, MP-5, PL-7, PM-1, PM-7, PM-8, PM-9, PM-11, SA-5, SA-17.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-18. |
link |
6 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
AU-1 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_AU-1 |
FedRAMP Moderate AU-1 |
Audit And Accountability |
Audit And Accountability Policy And Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops, documents, and disseminates to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:
1. An audit and accountability policy that addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and
2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the audit and accountability policy and associated audit and accountability controls; and
b. Reviews and updates the current:
1. Audit and accountability policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency]; and
2. Audit and accountability procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the establishment of policy and procedures for the effective implementation of selected security controls and control enhancements in the AU family. Policy and procedures reflect applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidance. Security program policies and procedures at the organization level may make the need for system-specific policies and procedures unnecessary. The policy can be included as part of the general information security policy for organizations or conversely, can be represented by multiple policies reflecting the complex nature of certain organizations. The procedures can be established for the security program in general and for particular information systems, if needed. The organizational risk management strategy is a key factor in establishing policy and procedures. Related control: PM-9.
Control Enhancements: None.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-12, 800-100. |
link |
4 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 |
PL-2 |
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_PL-2 |
FedRAMP Moderate PL-2 |
Planning |
System Security Plan |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops a security plan for the information system that:
1. Is consistent with the organization’s enterprise architecture;
2. Explicitly defines the authorization boundary for the system;
3. Describes the operational context of the information system in terms of missions and business processes;
4. Provides the security categorization of the information system including supporting rationale;
5. Describes the operational environment for the information system and relationships with or connections to other information systems;
6. Provides an overview of the security requirements for the system;
7. Identifies any relevant overlays, if applicable;
8. Describes the security controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements including a rationale for the tailoring and supplementation decisions; and
9. Is reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation;
b. Distributes copies of the security plan and communicates subsequent changes to the plan to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles];
c. Reviews the security plan for the information system [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];
d. Updates the plan to address changes to the information system/environment of operation or problems identified during plan implementation or security control assessments; and
e. Protects the security plan from unauthorized disclosure and modification.
Supplemental Guidance: Security plans relate security requirements to a set of security controls and control enhancements. Security plans also describe, at a high level, how the security controls and control enhancements meet those security requirements, but do not provide detailed, technical descriptions of the specific design or implementation of the controls/enhancements. Security plans contain sufficient information (including the specification of parameter values for assignment and selection statements either explicitly or by reference) to enable a design and implementation that is unambiguously compliant with the intent of the plans and subsequent determinations of risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation if the plan is implemented as intended. Organizations can also apply tailoring guidance to the security control baselines in Appendix D and CNSS Instruction 1253 to develop overlays for community-wide use or to address specialized requirements, technologies, or missions/environments of operation (e.g., DoD-tactical, Federal Public Key Infrastructure, or Federal Identity, Credential, and Access Management, space operations). Appendix I provides guidance on developing overlays.
Security plans need not be single documents; the plans can be a collection of various documents including documents that already exist. Effective security plans make extensive use of references to policies, procedures, and additional documents (e.g., design and implementation specifications) where more detailed information can be obtained. This reduces the documentation requirements associated with security programs and maintains security-related information in other established management/operational areas related to enterprise architecture, system development life cycle, systems engineering, and acquisition. For example, security plans do not contain detailed contingency plan or incident response plan information but instead provide explicitly or by reference, sufficient information to define what needs to be accomplished by those plans. Related controls: AC-2, AC-6, AC-14, AC-17, AC-20, CA-2, CA-3, CA-7, CM-9, CP-2, IR-8, MA-4, MA-5, MP-2, MP-4, MP-5, PL-7, PM-1, PM-7, PM-8, PM-9, PM-11, SA-5, SA-17.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-18. |
link |
6 |
hipaa |
0114.04b1Organizational.1-04.b |
hipaa-0114.04b1Organizational.1-04.b |
0114.04b1Organizational.1-04.b |
01 Information Protection Program |
0114.04b1Organizational.1-04.b 04.01 Information Security Policy |
Shared |
n/a |
The security policies are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure they reflect leading practices (e.g., for systems and services development and acquisition), and are communicated throughout the organization. |
|
9 |
hipaa |
0115.04b2Organizational.123-04.b |
hipaa-0115.04b2Organizational.123-04.b |
0115.04b2Organizational.123-04.b |
01 Information Protection Program |
0115.04b2Organizational.123-04.b 04.01 Information Security Policy |
Shared |
n/a |
The owner of the security policies has management approval and assigned responsibility to develop, review, update (based on specific input), and approve the security policies; and such reviews, updates, and approvals occur no less than annually. |
|
20 |
hipaa |
0119.05a1Organizational.3-05.a |
hipaa-0119.05a1Organizational.3-05.a |
0119.05a1Organizational.3-05.a |
01 Information Protection Program |
0119.05a1Organizational.3-05.a 05.01 Internal Organization |
Shared |
n/a |
Security contacts are appointed by name for each major organizational area or business unit. |
|
6 |
hipaa |
0863.09m2Organizational.910-09.m |
hipaa-0863.09m2Organizational.910-09.m |
0863.09m2Organizational.910-09.m |
08 Network Protection |
0863.09m2Organizational.910-09.m 09.06 Network Security Management |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization builds a firewall configuration that restricts connections between untrusted networks and any system components in the covered information environment; and any changes to the firewall configuration are updated in the network diagram. |
|
25 |
hipaa |
0866.09m3Organizational.1516-09.m |
hipaa-0866.09m3Organizational.1516-09.m |
0866.09m3Organizational.1516-09.m |
08 Network Protection |
0866.09m3Organizational.1516-09.m 09.06 Network Security Management |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization describes the groups, roles, and responsibilities for the logical management of network components, and ensures coordination of and consistency in the elements of the network infrastructure. |
|
11 |
hipaa |
12101.09ab1Organizational.3-09.ab |
hipaa-12101.09ab1Organizational.3-09.ab |
12101.09ab1Organizational.3-09.ab |
12 Audit Logging & Monitoring |
12101.09ab1Organizational.3-09.ab 09.10 Monitoring |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization specifies how often audit logs are reviewed, how the reviews are documented, and the specific roles and responsibilities of the personnel conducting the reviews, including the professional certifications or other qualifications required. |
|
18 |
hipaa |
1782.10a1Organizational.4-10.a |
hipaa-1782.10a1Organizational.4-10.a |
1782.10a1Organizational.4-10.a |
17 Risk Management |
1782.10a1Organizational.4-10.a 10.01 Security Requirements of Information Systems |
Shared |
n/a |
Security requirements and controls reflect the business value of the information assets involved, and the potential business damage that might result from a failure or absence of security. |
|
6 |
hipaa |
1793.10a2Organizational.91011-10.a |
hipaa-1793.10a2Organizational.91011-10.a |
1793.10a2Organizational.91011-10.a |
17 Risk Management |
1793.10a2Organizational.91011-10.a 10.01 Security Requirements of Information Systems |
Shared |
n/a |
The requirement definition phase includes (i) consideration of system requirements for information security and the processes for implementing security, and (ii) data classification and risk to information assets are assigned and approved (signed-off) by management to ensure appropriate controls are considered and the correct project team members are involved. |
|
6 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.12.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.12.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.12.1.1 |
Operations Security |
Documented operating procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
Operating procedures shall be documented and made available to all users who need them. |
link |
31 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.14.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.14.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.14.1.1 |
System Acquisition, Development And Maintenance |
Information security requirements analysis and specification |
Shared |
n/a |
The information security related requirements shall be included in the requirements for new information systems or enhancements to existing information systems. |
link |
24 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.18.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.18.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.18.1.1 |
Compliance |
Identification applicable legislation and contractual requirements |
Shared |
n/a |
All relevant legislative statutory, regulatory, contractual requirements and the organization's approach to meet these requirements shall be explicitly identified, documented and kept up to date for each information system and the organization. |
link |
30 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.18.2.2 |
ISO27001-2013_A.18.2.2 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.18.2.2 |
Compliance |
Compliance with security policies and standards |
Shared |
n/a |
Managers shall regularly review the compliance of information processing and procedures within their area of responsibility with the appropriate security policies, standards and any other security requirements. |
link |
36 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.5.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.5.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.5.1.1 |
Information Security Policies |
Policies for information security |
Shared |
n/a |
A set of policies for information security shall be defined, approved by management, published and communicated to employees and relevant external parties. |
link |
42 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.5.1.2 |
ISO27001-2013_A.5.1.2 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.5.1.2 |
Information Security Policies |
Review of the policies for information security |
Shared |
n/a |
The policies for information security shall be reviewed at planned intervals or if significant changes occur to ensure their continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness. |
link |
29 |
ISO27001-2013 |
A.6.1.1 |
ISO27001-2013_A.6.1.1 |
ISO 27001:2013 A.6.1.1 |
Organization of Information Security |
Information security roles and responsibilities |
Shared |
n/a |
All information security responsibilities shall be clearly defined and allocated. |
link |
73 |
ISO27001-2013 |
C.5.1.b |
ISO27001-2013_C.5.1.b |
ISO 27001:2013 C.5.1.b |
Leadership |
Leadership and commitment |
Shared |
n/a |
Top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the information
security management system by:
b) ensuring the integration of the information security management system requirements into the
organization’s processes. |
link |
28 |
ISO27001-2013 |
C.5.2.c |
ISO27001-2013_C.5.2.c |
ISO 27001:2013 C.5.2.c |
Leadership |
Policy |
Shared |
n/a |
Top management shall establish an information security policy that:
c) includes a commitment to satisfy applicable requirements related to information security. |
link |
23 |
ISO27001-2013 |
C.5.2.d |
ISO27001-2013_C.5.2.d |
ISO 27001:2013 C.5.2.d |
Leadership |
Policy |
Shared |
n/a |
Top management shall establish an information security policy that:
d) includes a commitment to continual improvement of the information security management system. |
link |
23 |
ISO27001-2013 |
C.9.2.e |
ISO27001-2013_C.9.2.e |
ISO 27001:2013 C.9.2.e |
Performance Evaluation |
Internal audit |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether
the information security management system:
e) select auditors and conduct audits that ensure objectivity and the impartiality of the audit process. |
link |
5 |
|
mp.info.1 Personal data |
mp.info.1 Personal data |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
33 |
|
mp.info.6 Backups |
mp.info.6 Backups |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
65 |
|
mp.s.2 Protection of web services and applications |
mp.s.2 Protection of web services and applications |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
102 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 |
.12.4 |
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.12.4 |
NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.12.4 |
Security Assessment |
Develop, document, and periodically update system security plans that describe system boundaries, system environments of operation, how security requirements are implemented, and the relationships with or connections to other systems. |
Shared |
Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. |
System security plans relate security requirements to a set of security controls. System security plans also describe, at a high level, how the security controls meet those security requirements, but do not provide detailed, technical descriptions of the design or implementation of the controls. System security plans contain sufficient information to enable a design and implementation that is unambiguously compliant with the intent of the plans and subsequent determinations of risk if the plan is implemented as intended. Security plans need not be single documents; the plans can be a collection of various documents including documents that already exist. Effective security plans make extensive use of references to policies, procedures, and additional documents (e.g., design and implementation specifications) where more detailed information can be obtained. This reduces the documentation requirements associated with security programs and maintains security-related information in other established management/operational areas related to enterprise architecture, system development life cycle, systems engineering, and acquisition. Federal agencies may consider the submitted system security plans and plans of action as critical inputs to an overall risk management decision to process, store, or transmit CUI on a system hosted by a nonfederal organization and whether it is advisable to pursue an agreement or contract with the nonfederal organization. [SP 800-18] provides guidance on developing security plans. [NIST CUI] provides supplemental material for Special Publication 800-171 including templates for system security plans. |
link |
8 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
AU-1 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_AU-1 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 AU-1 |
Audit And Accountability |
Audit And Accountability Policy And Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops, documents, and disseminates to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:
1. An audit and accountability policy that addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and
2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the audit and accountability policy and associated audit and accountability controls; and
b. Reviews and updates the current:
1. Audit and accountability policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency]; and
2. Audit and accountability procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the establishment of policy and procedures for the effective implementation of selected security controls and control enhancements in the AU family. Policy and procedures reflect applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidance. Security program policies and procedures at the organization level may make the need for system-specific policies and procedures unnecessary. The policy can be included as part of the general information security policy for organizations or conversely, can be represented by multiple policies reflecting the complex nature of certain organizations. The procedures can be established for the security program in general and for particular information systems, if needed. The organizational risk management strategy is a key factor in establishing policy and procedures. Related control: PM-9.
Control Enhancements: None.
References: NIST Special Publications 800-12, 800-100. |
link |
4 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4 |
PL-2 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R4_PL-2 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 PL-2 |
Planning |
System Security Plan |
Shared |
n/a |
The organization:
a. Develops a security plan for the information system that:
1. Is consistent with the organization’s enterprise architecture;
2. Explicitly defines the authorization boundary for the system;
3. Describes the operational context of the information system in terms of missions and business processes;
4. Provides the security categorization of the information system including supporting rationale;
5. Describes the operational environment for the information system and relationships with or connections to other information systems;
6. Provides an overview of the security requirements for the system;
7. Identifies any relevant overlays, if applicable;
8. Describes the security controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements including a rationale for the tailoring and supplementation decisions; and
9. Is reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation;
b. Distributes copies of the security plan and communicates subsequent changes to the plan to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles];
c. Reviews the security plan for the information system [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];
d. Updates the plan to address changes to the information system/environment of operation or problems identified during plan implementation or security control assessments; and
e. Protects the security plan from unauthorized disclosure and modification.
Supplemental Guidance: Security plans relate security requirements to a set of security controls and control enhancements. Security plans also describe, at a high level, how the security controls and control enhancements meet those security requirements, but do not provide detailed, technical descriptions of the specific design or implementation of the controls/enhancements. Security plans contain sufficient information (including the specification of parameter values for assignment and selection statements either explicitly or by reference) to enable a design and implementation that is unambiguously compliant with the intent of the plans and subsequent determinations of risk to organizational operations and assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation if the plan is implemented as intended. Organizations can also apply tailoring guidance to the security control baselines in Appendix D and CNSS Instruction 1253 to develop overlays for community-wide use or to address specialized requirements, technologies, or missions/environments of operation (e.g., DoD-tactical, Federal Public Key Infrastructure, or Federal Identity, Credential, and Access Management, space operations). Appendix I provides guidance on developing overlays.
Security plans need not be single documents; the plans can be a collection of various documents including documents that already exist. Effective security plans make extensive use of references to policies, procedures, and additional documents (e.g., design and implementation specifications) where more detailed information can be obtained. This reduces the documentation requirements associated with security programs and maintains security-related information in other established management/operational areas related to enterprise architecture, system development life cycle, systems engineering, and acquisition. For example, security plans do not contain detailed contingency plan or incident response plan information but instead provide explicitly or by reference, sufficient information to define what needs to be accomplished by those plans. Related controls: AC-2, AC-6, AC-14, AC-17, AC-20, CA-2, CA-3, CA-7, CM-9, CP-2, IR-8, MA-4, MA-5, MP-2, MP-4, MP-5, PL-7, PM-1, PM-7, PM-8, PM-9, PM-11, SA-5, SA-17.
References: NIST Special Publication 800-18. |
link |
6 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
AU-1 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_AU-1 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AU-1 |
Audit and Accountability |
Policy and Procedures |
Shared |
n/a |
a. Develop, document, and disseminate to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:
1. [Selection (OneOrMore): Organization-level;Mission/business process-level;System-level] audit and accountability policy that:
(a) Addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and
(b) Is consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and
2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the audit and accountability policy and the associated audit and accountability controls;
b. Designate an [Assignment: organization-defined official] to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the audit and accountability policy and procedures; and
c. Review and update the current audit and accountability:
1. Policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events]; and
2. Procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events]. |
link |
4 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5 |
PL-2 |
NIST_SP_800-53_R5_PL-2 |
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PL-2 |
Planning |
System Security and Privacy Plans |
Shared |
n/a |
a. Develop security and privacy plans for the system that:
1. Are consistent with the organization???s enterprise architecture;
2. Explicitly define the constituent system components;
3. Describe the operational context of the system in terms of mission and business processes;
4. Identify the individuals that fulfill system roles and responsibilities;
5. Identify the information types processed, stored, and transmitted by the system;
6. Provide the security categorization of the system, including supporting rationale;
7. Describe any specific threats to the system that are of concern to the organization;
8. Provide the results of a privacy risk assessment for systems processing personally identifiable information;
9. Describe the operational environment for the system and any dependencies on or connections to other systems or system components;
10. Provide an overview of the security and privacy requirements for the system;
11. Identify any relevant control baselines or overlays, if applicable;
12. Describe the controls in place or planned for meeting the security and privacy requirements, including a rationale for any tailoring decisions;
13. Include risk determinations for security and privacy architecture and design decisions;
14. Include security- and privacy-related activities affecting the system that require planning and coordination with [Assignment: organization-defined individuals or groups]; and
15. Are reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation.
b. Distribute copies of the plans and communicate subsequent changes to the plans to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles];
c. Review the plans [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];
d. Update the plans to address changes to the system and environment of operation or problems identified during plan implementation or control assessments; and
e. Protect the plans from unauthorized disclosure and modification. |
link |
6 |
|
op.pl.3 Acquisition of new components |
op.pl.3 Acquisition of new components |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
61 |
|
org.1 Security policy |
org.1 Security policy |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
94 |
|
org.2 Security regulations |
org.2 Security regulations |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
100 |
|
org.3 Security procedures |
org.3 Security procedures |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
83 |
|
org.4 Authorization process |
org.4 Authorization process |
404 not found |
|
|
|
n/a |
n/a |
|
126 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0 |
10.1.1 |
PCI_DSS_v4.0_10.1.1 |
PCI DSS v4.0 10.1.1 |
Requirement 10: Log and Monitor All Access to System Components and Cardholder Data |
Processes and mechanisms for logging and monitoring all access to system components and cardholder data are defined and documented |
Shared |
n/a |
All security policies and operational procedures that are identified in Requirement 10 are:
• Documented.
• Kept up to date.
• In use.
• Known to all affected parties. |
link |
4 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022 |
1.2 |
SWIFT_CSCF_v2022_1.2 |
SWIFT CSCF v2022 1.2 |
1. Restrict Internet Access & Protect Critical Systems from General IT Environment |
Restrict and control the allocation and usage of administrator-level operating system accounts. |
Shared |
n/a |
Access to administrator-level operating system accounts is restricted to the maximum extent possible. Usage is controlled, monitored, and only permitted for relevant activities such as software installation and configuration, maintenance, and emergency activities. At all other times, an account with the least privilege access is used. |
link |
22 |